I understand their loyalty to Clayton, who will be the Cy Young Award winner again and most likely National League MVP as well when 2014 MLB awards are handed later this month, but they are failing to look at the big picture. Compare the two left-handers stats and over the 162 game season, and the number shows that Kershaw is better. That is if you don't factor into that post-season play. So sure, ignore the greatest post season pitching performances since Christy Mathewson. That's fair, right?
That's like saying we love how our favorite Nascar driver and his car have performed in the Daytona 500's first 199 laps while it's in first place, but then ignoring that it broke down and was passed in the final lap. What it comes down to is that the job has to be finished, and that includes the additional 11 victories that a team must attain in post-season play to win the whole thing. You throw out those games from the statistical mix and the comparison is incomplete of it's most important comparable component.
This game is all about championships and Bumgarner has three of those and significant contributions in all of them. Clayton has failed in his postseason performances, and more than once.
So it come down to a simple question: what would you rather have? A player with an MVP and a couple of Cy Young awards OR a team with three World Series Championship trophies over five seasons?
Yeah, I thought so.
Good point Evan, but lets not forget that the failure in the postseason is not a one man show and Kershaw did not give up a lot and I would argue that his team didn't cover him. As where with Bumgarner his team made him look good, not that he wasn't dominating because he was. But also don't lose sight of what Kershaw did do over the course of the season and having done it with 2 fewer month's then any other pitcher!! I'll go with Kershaw and consider the losing in the post season as a failing by Ned, Mattingly and the team.
ReplyDelete